- Starts on
Event access: Internal
Scientific selection processes are essentially based on quality valuations about research. These quality valuations can be anonymous, as in peer review, or public, as in the case of the review. In any case, they are gatekeepers that determine which research contributions receive visibility and which do not. And: they are themselves places of scientific dispute. In the workshop "Review, Peer-Review, Tweet. Old and new quality valuations in science", members of the RG Cultures of Debate want to discuss which norms shape this form of debate and how they are changing. Three sessions with different guests are planned.
Learn more about the research group and this workshop.